<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Checkout Does Micropayments!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.puredoxyk.com/index.php/2006/12/27/google-checkout-does-micropayments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.puredoxyk.com/index.php/2006/12/27/google-checkout-does-micropayments/</link>
	<description>Polyphasic Sleep and Better Thinking</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed,  8 Sep 2010 17:33:18 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: puredoxyk</title>
		<link>http://www.puredoxyk.com/index.php/2006/12/27/google-checkout-does-micropayments/comment-page-1/#comment-1746</link>
		<dc:creator>puredoxyk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2006 13:22:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.puredoxyk.com/index.php/2006/12/27/google-checkout-does-micropayments/#comment-1746</guid>
		<description>Hmm, they didn&#039;t clue me in on the fee (2% + $0.20 per transaction)-- I&#039;d actually been looking for mention of it, but didn&#039;t find the page you did.  However, this isn&#039;t exactly a death knell for micropayments.  Here&#039;s why:

1.  All transactions are free until the END of 2007, not the beginning.  So the fees don&#039;t kick in until January 2008, according to the very page you so kindly cited for me.  This is obviously an offer designed to get merchants aboard, but still, that&#039;s a whole year.

2.  Google &lt;em&gt;does&lt;/em&gt; listen, and a year is plenty of time for people to bug them about getting rid of the fee on transactions of less than $0.50 or so.  They would still make plenty of money this way, I&#039;m sure.  I&#039;ll get started on bugging them right away!  ;)

2.5  Additionally, if enough people are using Google for micropayments by the end of 2007 and turning the fees on would tick off their customer base, I bet Google is even more inclined to work with people.

3.  &lt;em&gt;Somebody&#039;s&lt;/em&gt; going to do micropayments, darnit.  Google either knows this or will know it soon; they&#039;re usually not too far behind the curve.  (Their secret?  They listen to their techies.  A friend of mine went to work for Google a few years back as a software engineer, and he&#039;s had nothing but good things to say about it (which is rare for a software engineer, believe me! ;)

4.  And lastly, only making a profit on $.50 really isn&#039;t that bad.  Even if it stayed that way, it would still be a far better deal than PayPal, and a definite step in the right direction.

...And hey, thanks VERY much for the additional info!  It was very helpful, and I&#039;ll start a conversation with them about the details asap.  But overall, I&#039;m still very hopeful.

-PD</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, they didn&#8217;t clue me in on the fee (2% + $0.20 per transaction)&#8211; I&#8217;d actually been looking for mention of it, but didn&#8217;t find the page you did.  However, this isn&#8217;t exactly a death knell for micropayments.  Here&#8217;s why:</p>
<p>1.  All transactions are free until the END of 2007, not the beginning.  So the fees don&#8217;t kick in until January 2008, according to the very page you so kindly cited for me.  This is obviously an offer designed to get merchants aboard, but still, that&#8217;s a whole year.</p>
<p>2.  Google <em>does</em> listen, and a year is plenty of time for people to bug them about getting rid of the fee on transactions of less than $0.50 or so.  They would still make plenty of money this way, I&#8217;m sure.  I&#8217;ll get started on bugging them right away!  ;)</p>
<p>2.5  Additionally, if enough people are using Google for micropayments by the end of 2007 and turning the fees on would tick off their customer base, I bet Google is even more inclined to work with people.</p>
<p>3.  <em>Somebody&#8217;s</em> going to do micropayments, darnit.  Google either knows this or will know it soon; they&#8217;re usually not too far behind the curve.  (Their secret?  They listen to their techies.  A friend of mine went to work for Google a few years back as a software engineer, and he&#8217;s had nothing but good things to say about it (which is rare for a software engineer, believe me! ;)</p>
<p>4.  And lastly, only making a profit on $.50 really isn&#8217;t that bad.  Even if it stayed that way, it would still be a far better deal than PayPal, and a definite step in the right direction.</p>
<p>&#8230;And hey, thanks VERY much for the additional info!  It was very helpful, and I&#8217;ll start a conversation with them about the details asap.  But overall, I&#8217;m still very hopeful.</p>
<p>-PD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave McClure</title>
		<link>http://www.puredoxyk.com/index.php/2006/12/27/google-checkout-does-micropayments/comment-page-1/#comment-1745</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave McClure</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2006 12:14:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.puredoxyk.com/index.php/2006/12/27/google-checkout-does-micropayments/#comment-1745</guid>
		<description>nope, don&#039;t count on it... and certainly not after Jan 1st, 2007.

both with Google and with PayPal (and with most anyone else as well that processes credit cards), there is a minimum transaction processing fee that is between 20-30 cents.  thus, the minimum effective &quot;micro-transaction&quot; you could reasonably do without losing money is somewhere around a quarter with Google, or 35 cents with PayPal.  however, most people probably wouldn&#039;t get a lot of value from this unless they start charging closer to .50 or more.

see Google&#039;s fees here:
  https://checkout.google.com/seller/fees.html
see PayPal&#039;s fees here:
  https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_display-receiving-fees-outside

(full disclosure: i used to work for PayPal from 2001 to 2004)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nope, don&#8217;t count on it&#8230; and certainly not after Jan 1st, 2007.</p>
<p>both with Google and with PayPal (and with most anyone else as well that processes credit cards), there is a minimum transaction processing fee that is between 20-30 cents.  thus, the minimum effective &#8220;micro-transaction&#8221; you could reasonably do without losing money is somewhere around a quarter with Google, or 35 cents with PayPal.  however, most people probably wouldn&#8217;t get a lot of value from this unless they start charging closer to .50 or more.</p>
<p>see Google&#8217;s fees here:<br />
  <a href="https://checkout.google.com/seller/fees.html" rel="nofollow">https://checkout.google.com/seller/fees.html</a><br />
see PayPal&#8217;s fees here:<br />
  <a href="https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_display-receiving-fees-outside" rel="nofollow">https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_display-receiving-fees-outside</a></p>
<p>(full disclosure: i used to work for PayPal from 2001 to 2004)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
