<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Know Thyself:  How Homo Are You?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.puredoxyk.com/index.php/2009/05/27/know-thyself-how-homo-are-you/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.puredoxyk.com/index.php/2009/05/27/know-thyself-how-homo-are-you/</link>
	<description>Polyphasic Sleep and Better Thinking</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat,  4 Sep 2010 22:54:02 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bruce N. Stein</title>
		<link>http://www.puredoxyk.com/index.php/2009/05/27/know-thyself-how-homo-are-you/comment-page-1/#comment-38854</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce N. Stein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 16:38:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.puredoxyk.com/?p=1280#comment-38854</guid>
		<description>I chose 10% as I like chicks plain and simple. However, I don&#039;t find male affection repulsive by any stretch, and do have a (mostly academic) interest in it in regards to my own experimentations.  However, there&#039;s also a very specific (and hilarious) m/m/f situation that I have on my &quot;List of Things to Do Before I Die&quot;, and accomplishing such would require at least &lt;i&gt;some&lt;/i&gt; level of &quot;teh gay&quot;. It is the case, though, that the f/f/m situations that are locked in my head are far more numerous and much more preferably. However, none of them are on my List... huh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I chose 10% as I like chicks plain and simple. However, I don&#8217;t find male affection repulsive by any stretch, and do have a (mostly academic) interest in it in regards to my own experimentations.  However, there&#8217;s also a very specific (and hilarious) m/m/f situation that I have on my &#8220;List of Things to Do Before I Die&#8221;, and accomplishing such would require at least <i>some</i> level of &#8220;teh gay&#8221;. It is the case, though, that the f/f/m situations that are locked in my head are far more numerous and much more preferably. However, none of them are on my List&#8230; huh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: puredoxyk</title>
		<link>http://www.puredoxyk.com/index.php/2009/05/27/know-thyself-how-homo-are-you/comment-page-1/#comment-38852</link>
		<dc:creator>puredoxyk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 15:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.puredoxyk.com/?p=1280#comment-38852</guid>
		<description>Yes, having only a handful of labels that are socially understood makes things harder for everybody, I think.  Of course, not too long ago we didn&#039;t even really have &quot;bisexual&quot;, so it&#039;s not as if things aren&#039;t improving...just way, way too slowly.

Personally, I&#039;m all about giving people the room to identify themselves however they choose to, including with an explanation if necessary -- don&#039;t ask if you don&#039;t want an answer, including one that might not easily fit a common category.  Then again, I also think more people should take advantage of &quot;don&#039;t ask&quot;, and keep their noses out of business what isn&#039;t theirs...or at least realize when they&#039;re crossing a line and be accordingly polite.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, having only a handful of labels that are socially understood makes things harder for everybody, I think.  Of course, not too long ago we didn&#8217;t even really have &#8220;bisexual&#8221;, so it&#8217;s not as if things aren&#8217;t improving&#8230;just way, way too slowly.</p>
<p>Personally, I&#8217;m all about giving people the room to identify themselves however they choose to, including with an explanation if necessary &#8212; don&#8217;t ask if you don&#8217;t want an answer, including one that might not easily fit a common category.  Then again, I also think more people should take advantage of &#8220;don&#8217;t ask&#8221;, and keep their noses out of business what isn&#8217;t theirs&#8230;or at least realize when they&#8217;re crossing a line and be accordingly polite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jadelyn</title>
		<link>http://www.puredoxyk.com/index.php/2009/05/27/know-thyself-how-homo-are-you/comment-page-1/#comment-38851</link>
		<dc:creator>Jadelyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 04:26:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.puredoxyk.com/?p=1280#comment-38851</guid>
		<description>I think another interesting thing to consider here is that, given the three basic categories we&#039;re socially allowed (hetero, homo, bi)...at what percentages do we take on various identities?  I&#039;m one of those who identified as 70%.  Depending on who&#039;s asking, I&#039;ll either call myself bi, queer, or if I&#039;m really wanting to be specific, mostly-lesbian bisexual.  But there have also been times when I&#039;ve identified as lesbian when asked, because that was what felt right to me at that time.  Is 70% an acceptable threshold to ID as lesbian, if I&#039;m going to stay with one of the big three descriptors, or do I stick with bi?  Would 80% be enough?  90?  100?  Where is the line?  How homo can one be before one should identify as something other than straight?

Long way of saying, this is why I like the term queer.  It encompasses it all, for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think another interesting thing to consider here is that, given the three basic categories we&#8217;re socially allowed (hetero, homo, bi)&#8230;at what percentages do we take on various identities?  I&#8217;m one of those who identified as 70%.  Depending on who&#8217;s asking, I&#8217;ll either call myself bi, queer, or if I&#8217;m really wanting to be specific, mostly-lesbian bisexual.  But there have also been times when I&#8217;ve identified as lesbian when asked, because that was what felt right to me at that time.  Is 70% an acceptable threshold to ID as lesbian, if I&#8217;m going to stay with one of the big three descriptors, or do I stick with bi?  Would 80% be enough?  90?  100?  Where is the line?  How homo can one be before one should identify as something other than straight?</p>
<p>Long way of saying, this is why I like the term queer.  It encompasses it all, for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
